10 Şubat 2014 Pazartesi

Didem Ürer / I am a Muslim / Istanbul / Turkey


ISLAM IS THE MOST COMFORTABLE WAY OF LIFE FOR PEOPLE

 by Didem Ürer
As the entire world is witnessing the damages brought by radicalism and bigotry, people come to grasp the true nature of Islam and that every beautiful thing belongs to Islam. Of course, the beauties of Islam and how morals of religion are opposed to bigotry cannot be explained in a brief article. 
However the actual goal of every believer should be to introduce Islam in a way other than the bigots did till now, because every freedom of true Islam is within democratic boundaries. Islam does not in any way take away others’ rights and indeed Islam is the perfect religion in which people can live all the freedoms of the human soul and can take pleasure from them. Therefore the ones who embrace the morals of the Qur’an use their minds to the utmost level and apply arts and science in the best manner.
 
Islam is a way of living that encompasses human morality and relations in the best possible way, makes people most comfortable, with peace, justice, security, brotherhood, love to the utmost and helps people live in the best  and  the most comfortable way. And Allah created people’s character in line with Islam. Under normal circumstances, Allah could have created difficulties as a test. We would live our religion under very difficult circumstances. We would comply with this and we would be thankful. We would accept this test Allah created in the life of this world and we would strive to gain Allah’s mercy. Allah reveals in the Qur’an that He will make us successful in what is easy: “We will ease you to the Easy Way.” (Surah A'la: 8)
 
To live Islam is to live what is easy. As Allah revealed in the Qur’an, Islam is easy as the religion of our ancestor Prophet Abraham’s (pbuh) religion. Everyone knows that Islam is the religion of ease: “… He has selected you and not placed any constraint upon you in the observance of your religion—the religion of your forefather Abraham…” (Surat al-Hajj: 78)
 
On the contrary, bigots have their own way of living opposed to the ease in Islam. According to these bigots, you will not laugh, talk, listen to music, dance, look, eat, drink or become rich in any way. For example a person earns money and becomes rich. This is a crime according to the bigots. You will not earn money. If you earn money, that is a crime. If you laugh, that is a crime. If you laugh less, that is also a crime and if you laugh too much that is even a bigger crime. If you listen to music, that is a crime. If you pass across and see a work of art, that is also a crime. There is nothing that is not a crime. Even breathing air is a crime according to bigots. They have made everything a crime. Even reading the Qur’an without their interpretation is a crime. 
 
They have made reading the message of Allah, from which we can learn our religion and all the details of good morality, and of which we are responsible for in the hereafter, a crime. And this is a great responsibility in the sight of Allah.
 
Therefore, telling people of the true nature of Islam in this period is really important. In order for all people to turn to Islam, to learn that human character is compatible with Islam and to accept Islam in peace and ease of heart, telling people the truth of Islam that is in line with the Qur’an and the Sunnah of our Prophet (saas) is very important.

Didem Ürer / I am a Muslim / Istanbul / Turkey


Turkey joining the EU will benefit Europe 1

by Didem Ürer
To date Europe has always given the impression that “admitting Turkey to the EU will be doing it a great favor.” Yet looking at the current picture, Turkey’s joining the EU is looking increasingly like a blessing on them instead.
Normally, Turkey is a valuable treasure chest for Europe. Yet Europe is either unaware of this or else ignores the fact because of its conservative tendencies. Of course, however, Turkey has a responsibility to provide an appropriate answer to some concerns of Europe’s. Turkey’s attitudes in respect of extremism, freedom of ideas and freedom of movement are particularly important for Europe. Yet the fact is that Turkey’s accession to the EU may be more of a serious benefit for Europe  than it is for Turkey.
In order to understand this better, we should examine the current socio-economic positions and stipulated futures of Turkey and Europe and compare the current status of the two societies
The current position in Europe
First and foremost, the economic crisis into which, with a few exceptions, the countries of Europe have fallen is plain to see. Every day another European country comes to the brink of bankruptcy. Many of them are already at that brink.
Following Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy, belt-tightening policies are now being applied by the governments of France and Poland. Unemployment in these countries is at record levels. In April, for example, unemployment in France broke a 16-year record. Thousands of people are being made redundant. France’s credit rating was reduced. Denmark's budget deficit in 2012, $13 billion, was the highest for the last 28 years.
Those affected by the crisis in the EU are mainly the young. Many hungry young people are lining up at the gates of charities and universities that hand out one free meal a day. Most young people are unqualified and unemployed, and therefore are regarded as a burden on society and alienated. This means the most dynamic and productive section of society remaining on the sidelines. In addition to the sidelining of the young, the rapidly rising average age in the EU is another factor affecting its development and dynamism.
There is no end to the daily protests taking place in European countries. As the EU governments seek to take measures against the economic crisis confronting them, they are also having to deal with  masses of people taking to the streets to oppose those measures.
Due to the Darwinist-materialist education largely provided in Europe, the EU's society is rapidly losing spiritual values and on the way to becoming a cold and soulless society. Cases of depression, imbalance, a tendency to crime, psychological disorders such as sadism, rage attacks and suicide are all rising by the day.
The European Monitoring Center for Drugs and Drug Addiction (EMCDDA) has announced a major rise in the use of synthetic drugs in Europe. EU Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmstroem has expressed concern at the fact that one fourth of European adults, approximately 85 million people, has used an illegal drug.
Racism and xenophobia in Europe
Today, fascistic ideas, racist thinking and xenophobia are increasingly widespread in many EU countries, particularly Germany, but also Austria, Great Britain and Greece. This perversion, generally equated with extreme right-wing groups , in fact subtly manifests itself in many segments of society and even in mechanisms of state.
The problem is particularly striking during police checks. For example, the German police [Ron Mastr1]  submit migrants to checks in airports and railroad stations on the pretext of looking for illegals. African citizens are exposed to racism and discrimination, not just from the extreme right, but from all sections of society. (Deutsche Welle)
In Great Britain, the group known as the English Defense League stage protests aimed at Muslims involving slogans of hate. A large part of the media incites this feeling of hatred with news and discussion programs. The scale of the attacks and threats against Muslims, particularly over the internet, is rising by the day.
In Austria, the Austrian Freedom Party (FPÖ) - which increased its share of the vote in the latest elections - has based its election policies solely on ‘anti-foreigner and anti-Islamic’ rhetoric. It opposes migrant living in Austria being able to benefit from social assistance, social housing and child benefits. It also demands the deportation of foreigners who have been unemployed for more than a year.
The Golden Dawn Party in Greece is known for violent and provocative actions aimed against migrants.
The EU, which gives the impression of being one of the staunchest defenders of democracy and human rights, thus exhibits an internally inconsistent profile.
The EU and EU governments’ efforts to overcome these problems, of which we have listed only a few, are largely inadequate and unsuccessful. Reasonable, effective and outcome-oriented measures are not being taken.
Indeed, although the EU reacts swiftly to sudden events such as the coup in Egypt or the crisis in Syria, it has become increasingly clear that it is not a dynamic body taking incremental and proactive decisions. On the contrary, it has emerged as a lethargic and sclerotic body.
That being the case, the way that the EU looks for flaws and makes criticisms when it comes to Turkey, as if it were not itself  becoming a center for new problems and crises by the day, gives rise to an inconsistent and ludicrous picture.
In a subsequent piece I shall be looking at the current position in Turkey and the contributions it can make to the EU.

Didem Ürer / I am a Muslim / Istanbul / Turkey


Turkey’s accession to the EU will benefit Europe 2

by Didem Ürer
In the first part of this piece I described how Turkey is a highly valuable treasure chest for Europe, but that Europe acts as if it were unaware of this, and how some of its concerns regarding Turkey still needed to be overcome. I also described in what ways Europe needs Turkey.
Turkey’s current position and what it can contribute to the EU
There are numerous economic and social features that Turkey can contribute to the EU within the framework of full membership. It has a powerful institutional structure and a much stronger and better managed economy compared to the past. It is a country with the most liberal trade policies in the world, and one capable of acting independently of the IMF.
According to IMF data, with a growth rate of 8.5%, Turkey is one of the fastest growing economies, and the 17th largest economy, in the world. It is also the sixth largest economy in the world. This growth rate is one that Western countries can only dream of. While the credit ratings of several European countries are falling, Turkey’s is on the rise.
Turkey is the world’s eighth and Europe’s second largest producer of steel. It maintains its second place, after China, in the global construction sector.
It is the seventh most visited country in the world. Turkish Airlines is one of the world’s fastest-growing airlines. Turkey has initiated the world’s largest second airport project and is thus positioned to become the largest air transit hub between the European and Asian continents.
With this economic superiority in too many sectors for us to list here, Turkey is strong enough to reinvigorate and grow the EU economy by broadening the EU market to an additional 76 million people. While it enables EU firms to make direct investments and enjoy significant advantages, it will also serve as a major bridge for these firms to enter the Middle East and Asian markets.
Not only in the economic field, but also in the social arena Turkey has very quickly realized much progress and many reforms by freeing itself of its cumbersome structure of the last century. Removal of the hand of the Ergenekon terror organization from Turkey’s throat has played the most important role in initiating a highly visible process of improvement, regularization and democratization in the economic and social spheres. The disappearance, to a large extent, of such horrors as human rights violations, torture and unsolved killings are one of the positive outcomes of this.
Turkey has a much younger population compared to those of EU countries. Some half the population is under 29. As I mentioned earlier, Turkey’s youthful population in an EU whose average age is rising rapidly  means greater dynamism and productivity in the economic and social spheres. The youthful and quality work force that Turkey has to offer is highly important for the EU market, which is estimated to need another 100 million people by 2050.
 In addition, modern, progressive, intelligent, moral, spiritually developed and immaculate young Turks, free of any extremism, mean new blood by representing a healthy and sound example for European youth in search of an identity due to the indoctrination of Darwinist, materialist education.
Turkey’s place as a role model for the Middle East, Islamic countries and the Turkic republics is indisputable. A Turkey within the body of the EU will therefore have an inevitably positive and constructive impact on the process of democratization and modernization of countries in the region. Therefore, one of the natural consequences of the improvement of the countries in question will be a contribution to the stability and peace of the EU.
Both sides must discharge their responsibilities
While Turkey strives to establish union between Islamic countries with its brotherly spirit, it has chosen, beginning under the leadership of the great Ataturk, not to turn its back on modern Western civilizations. The EU is one part of that objective.
The proper course of action, therefore, is for both sides to fulfill their duties and accelerate the process toward full membership in the near future.  Turkey’s application for membership, which began with associate membership of the EEC in 1959 and has continued for half a century, now holds the record as the longest application process ever.
Turkey has fulfilled its own responsibilities for this membership with the best of intentions and great effort, and is still continuing to do so. Indeed, the adjustments demanded from Turkey are to the benefit of our country in terms of elevating values such as democracy, freedom, human rights and freedom of thought. We have lost nothing.
The determination and success of the government in this regard, and the point reached, are clear for all to see: Therefore, now that we have traveled all this distance, it is important to continue to be determined, without being worn down, and to keep the issue constantly on the agenda. It is vitally important to establish warm relations with Christian and Jewish communities, to build links with civil society organizations in order to enjoy nations’ support, to strengthen bonds of friendship with Israel and to make everyone, no matter what their opinions, feel loved.
Europe must also discharge its duties. It is essential for it to avoid Islamophobia, to move forward as a friend of Islam rather than an enemy and to wage a serious campaign against racism and xenophobia. It must behave within the criteria of universal democracy, without striving to adopt a Christian culture and understanding to the exclusion of everyone else. It must free itself of the paranoia of regarding Turkish growth and development as a threat to itself; on the contrary, it needs to rid itself of this conservative and prejudiced attitude and evaluate the benefits and advantages to itself from a partnership with Turkey in a rational manner. It must be forward looking and have a vision. It must see there can be no development or progress with its cumbersome structure, ruined economy and social collapse; on the contrary, it must see that European cohesiveness will be torn asunder  if it continues down this road.
In conclusion, Turkey’s accession to the EU and the giant “alliance of civilizations” that will ensue will clearly be to the advantage of both parties. The virtues of Islam, such as love, democracy and freedom of ideas, will also serve to guide the people of Europe. In the same way that Christians, Jews, Muslims and people from all faiths, sects and tribes benefitted from the delights of Islam in the times of our Prophet (saas) and the Companions, and then later in Ottoman times, so they will benefit from these beauties and blessings today with the addition of Turkey as a member state of the European Union.

Ceylan Özbudak / I am a Muslim / Istanbul / Turkey


What kind of an islamic union?

By Harun Yahya
The First World War and the Second World War taught humanity a lesson in the form of wanton slaughter on a global scale, major European cities reduced to rubble, flattened housing estates, and genocidal concentration camps. The West, caught in the middle of these wars, drew a very important lesson from these tragedies: form alliances in order to have an efficient, easier, and quicker conflict-resolution mechanism. Other European countries had tried to form alliances in the past, but these were never long-lived either because of a conflict of national interest or for some ideological reason. This time, the West knew that the desired union had to be more than just an economic or a joint defense pact; it had to be a union established upon common cultural values. Obviously, this is a lengthy process.
Islamin union 1And when your Lord announced: “If you are grateful, I will certainly give you increase, but if you are ungrateful, My punishment is severe.”
(Qur’an, 14:7)
These wars devastated Europe’s economy and industry. The survivors had to rebuild hundreds of cities, repair infrastructure, and reestablish a functioning education and health system. The war was over, but now the colonies were demanding independence. It appeared to be a hard job to create stability as well as a union amidst all of this turmoil. The first step in this direction was the European Coal and Steel Federation, formed in 1951 primarily to serve and develop industry. This union eventually became the European Economic Community (EEC), then the European Community (EC), and finally the European Union (EU). Eventually, it became a strong union in which products, services, capital, and labor freely circulate between member states; a union having a common currency, compatible laws, and even state bureaucracies. Today, the EU is one of the major players on the international political stage.
islamic union 2
The military, political, and economic unity of the Islamic world will enable a better use of the available resources and allow it to accomplish major cultural and economic development.
The Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC) has 56 member states and is the largest Muslim organization in terms of number of members and of geography. In addition, there are several regional military and trade alliances between neighboring Muslim nations, each of which fulfills important functions and represents a positive development. However, the Islamic world needs a more comprehensive union, one with permanent institutions empowered to take binding decisions, develop and implement common policies, represent the entire Islamic world, and produce solutions for all Muslims rather than just in a few regional hotspots. This union’s power must be economic, military, and social. The existence of such a union will create an environment of mutual trust and agreement so that a sense of solidarity will develop. Accordingly, the member states’ security concerns will be addressed, and the resulting extensive cooperation will result in higher standards of living in the member states. Acting as one body in all affairs concerning it, either directly or indirectly, this world will be able to develop strategies that are in the Islamic world’s best interest.
Islamic union 3In the second half of the twentieth century, developments in Palestine, Bosnia, Kosovo, Nagorno-Karabakh, Kashmir, and Aceh brought an important truth home to the Islamic world. In these regions, where thousands of civilians lost their lives, countless children were orphaned and savagery and violence reached shocking levels, the West either did not react at all or was slow to take preventive action. Such indifference reminded the Muslims once more that all of them are responsible for protecting the rights of other Muslims and meeting their needs.
Therefore, the Islamic world has to be very responsive and proactive, for only united Muslim nations can guarantee the safety of all Muslims by speaking for all Muslims in the international political arena with one voice.
The Islamic world has to become one bloc in terms of military, politics, and economics. An Islamic world united from within will ensure world peace and prevent radicals from moving toward a clash of civilizations based upon their ideologies of self-interest and conflict.
The writer has authored more than 300 books translated in 73 languages on politics, religion and science. He may be followed at @Harun_Yahya and www.harunyahya.com.

Damla Pamir / I am a Muslim / Istanbul / Turkey




9 Şubat 2014 Pazar

Damla Pamir / Istanbul / Turkey


Tülay Kumaşçı / Istanbul / Turkey


Merve Büyükbayrak / Istanbul / Turkey


Görkem Erdoğan / Istanbul / Turkey


Ece Koc / Istanbul / Turkey


Ebru Altan / Istanbul / Turkey


Gülgün Göktan / Istanbul / Turkey


Beyza Bayraktar / Istanbul / Turkey


Aslı Süme / Istanbul / Turkey


Gülşah Güçyetmez / Istanbul / Turkey


Mehtap Şahin / Istanbul / Turkey


Beril Koncagül / Istanbul / Turkey


Didem Ürer / Istanbul / Turkey



Turkey: Playing Dirty Will Serve None

With the mention of terms like manipulated polls, one-party system, dictatorship and coups, the next thing that comes to one’s mind is the Middle East. This image has become so ingrained in the psyche of certain elements in various countries of this region that if a move is made to break the mold; those favoring status quo — obviously to pursue their selfish interests — try to push the country into chaos using all means possible.
 
A slight mishandling of an issue turns the government into a punching bag for people who like to construe an administration’s weakness or mistake as its failure. Instead of adopting a reconciliatory approach, efforts are made to overthrow the government.
 
That is exactly what is currently happening in Turkey. Despite a strong democratic past that saw Turkey emerging as a regional powerhouse, it continues to show those unpleasant traits perhaps unique to this region. The same old rotten mentality is evident since the anti-graft operation of Dec. 17, 2013. Instead of going to the polls with fresh ideas, this mindset stresses the need for getting results through the use of undemocratic methods. Such an attitude is indicative of a society wherein democracy has not taken roots and which does not know how to respect the aspirations of the masses. A similar debate is under way in Turkey. Another issue that has become a must during such debates is the presence of a parallel administrative structure in the form of Fetullah Gulen community.
 
Let us first discuss the much-trumpeted anti-graft operations that sent shockwaves around the world so much so that on the basis of this operation, political pundits are predicting the demise of the Justice and Development Party (AKP) government. Only time will tell how justified these claims are.
 
This writer does not wish to indulge into the details of those anti-graft operations that saw names of some ministers’ children and top officials coming to the fore and the questioning of the trade ties between Turkey and Iran. Despite Prime Minister Recep Teyyip Erdogan’s repeated assurances that these corruption charges would be thoroughly probed, the anti-government camp continues to raise a furor. In such a situation, it has become all the more important to analyze the situation carefully, as it is affecting Turkey.
 
An unbiased study of the post-Dec.17 events reveals that apart from the corruption allegations, many actions taken by certain quarters look rather conspiratorial. Interestingly, as many would assume only a single group could not be blamed for those. 
 
Such a phenomenon is not new to Turkey, as it has endured years of a parallel state within a state. That deep state was unable to conceal its illegal activities in the past and everyone was aware of it apart from its name and knew that it manifested itself in targeted killings and other terror activities. However, this time around the situation is different. 
 
Today the government is facing an alliance of elements of all hues. This “common opposition” is not acting as an organized entity with a well-defined hierarchy. It is more of a marriage of convenience between various anti-government forces against one common enemy. They appear to be following the principle: The enemy of my enemy is my friend. It is, unfortunately, always easy to establish such an alliance in the Middle East, where opponents always seek to bring down the government rather than bring in democracy. Such alliances easily gain support from natural opponents who do not know one another, from inside or outside the country. 
 
The trend of opposition for the sake of opposition in the region and the Muslim world has been a major cause of our backwardness and social turmoil. Creative criticism helps a group or country grow. The right course is always to support the truth. Supporting the truth is possible by always concentrating on, and appreciating positive aspects while criticizing the negative ones. Under absolute opposition the ability to analyze a situation objectively is compromised and is replaced by an ultra-partisan spirit. The only outcome is conflict.
 
It is due to this ultra-partisan spirit; some people are unable to come up with an objective analysis of Turkey’s situation. The geographical location of Turkey is unique, as it is simultaneously part of the Middle East and Europe. It has stretched out to all countries, from Myanmar to Somalia. It is a devout, democratic, libertarian but also conservative country. 
 
As a democratic Islamic country, it has to be a role model and it goes without saying that it is very difficult to be the premier of such a country. Establishing internal and external equilibrium when there is war and conflict all around, bringing in democratization while strengthening the economy, building bridges and dams while at the same time adjusting the country to EU criteria and putting an end to terror, the country’s greatest problem, is not easy. 
 
Claims about the presence of a parallel structure in Turkey have caused considerable damage to the ties between the government and the Gulen community. It is true that some members of the community have joined in hands with other anti-government forces but one cannot blame the entire community for the actions of a few individuals. These individuals must not play into the hands of anti-Turkey forces whose primary aim is to bring down the government and to destabilize the country. 
 
An unstable Turkey would spell disaster for the entire region, which is already up in flames. It is high time the media and the opposition forces acted wisely and adopted a reconciliatory approach, as it would benefit all. If we want peace and stability in the Middle East — and the world — we must use the language of love.
 
Adnan Oktar's article on Arab News:
 

Dilem Köknar / Istanbul / Turkey


Only a Muslim Peace Force Can Resolve the Syrian Problem
With the 55,000 photographs that emerged prior to the Geneva talks , photos which clearly showed that the Assad regime  tortured people to death in its prisons, the idea that the regime and its human rights violations  have to be stopped has again become a matter of public discussion.
Of course these photographs are important evidence in proving the atrocities committed by the regime. However, we must not forget that the same regime oppressed the Syrian people long before there was a civil war in Syria and even before Bashar Assad himself came to power; it is not the first time that the Ba'athist ideology unleashed a bloodbath. According to the latest data from the International Rescue Committee, nine million people in Syria have had to abandon their homes since 2011: Six million of these are living as refugees inside and outside the country. Among the female refugees, 41,000 of the women who left Syria were pregnant. 30,000 doctors were forced to leave the country and approximately 500 healthcare professionals are in jail. The fact that Assad’s forces are constantly besieging villages and districts, using crude barrel bombs and engaging in a policy of mass slaughter making no allowances for women, children and the elderly has been demonstrated time and time again. Most recently, epidemics have begun appearing among innocent people deprived of medical aid.
Even though there is still a geographic location referred to as Syria, it is no longer possible to speak of a Syrian state; the Syria with thousands of years of history that once stood on trade routes no longer exists. It is impossible to speak of any healthy industry in a Syria in which its best known historical artifacts have been destroyed, buildings  have been ruined wholesale and the vast majority of the infrastructure and transport system has disappeared. An 80% decline in all industrial production across the state has been reported since 2011, but the true figure is said to be 90%. Assad, who is still trying to cling to his throne  under pressure from the Ba’ath regime, or perhaps from fear for his own life, is simply trying to keep breathing inside a single house on a steep hill. The people known as the Syrian people have become little more than a group of refugees trying to survive under terribly harsh conditions in tent cities in surrounding countries.
The idea of a “Western intervention against Syria,’’ which entered the agenda after Assad’s use of sarin gas, is clearly never going to achieve the desired result. The crude nature of the methods being proposed by the USA and other Western states, which generally harbor good intentions such as getting aid to the people in the region or finding a swift solution to the crisis, may lead to even greater losses among people already weakened and trapped in a tiny corner of Syria and inflict even worse conditions on them.
However, the human drama in Syria obviously needs a solution. That solution is for Muslim states to unite, irrespective of sect, and enter Syria from every point possible. If all the Muslim states, whether close to the region or not, establish a peace force by sending just one battalion each, that Muslim peace force will create a psychological climate in which Assad’s already demoralized units will be unable to resist. Peace- keeping forces armed for security reasons can enter Syria from 70 different points, take control of the state of emergency and bring stability to Syria, after which they can leave Syria again without having given anyone so much as a nosebleed. This force, the result of many states coming together, will not create any considerable economic problem for the countries involved. Supervision of the Muslim peace-keeoing force by the U.S. and EU forces will also have a calming effect on world public opinion.
Examples of this have been seen in the past. Following Milosevic’s attempted ethnic cleansing and massacre of the Muslim population of Kosovo  in 1998, NATO units entered Kosovo on June 12, 1999, in the largest ground operation undertaken in Europe since the Second World War; the U.N. placed the region under its control until Kosovo became independent. Milosevic knew he could not withstand all those NATO units and immediately withdrew from Kosovo without the loss of a single life in the ground operation.
Is this the only such instance in history? Of course not. God speaks of the armies of Solomon in the Koran. Solomon had the largest military force of the time, and since they knew they would be unable to defeat it, no other state went to war with it. Solomon’s possession of this military strength stemmed from his being on the side, not of war, but of peace; that army was a deterrent force founded, not to wage war or shed blood, but to build peace. Solomon knew that no wicked community could withstand that force and that there would be no need to fight, given that he was in possession of it. He was also a prophet who would, quite literally, not hurt an ant. God reveals this superior moral virtue by describing in the Koran how Solomon told his armies to step off the road in order to avoid crushing a female ant.
It is essential for Muslim states to come together and discharge the duty of establishing peace so the Syrian people do not suffer any further, and so this crisis that is troubling the conscience of the world can be resolved. Any other course of action may give rise to undesirable consequences, both for those states wishing to intervene and for the people of Syria. In order to put a swift end to the suffering of innocent people, Muslims must set aside their differences of opinion and prove themselves capable of acting together. 
 
Adnan Oktar's article on Kuwait Times: